What's The Best Franchise for
YOU?
Get the information you need to make a wise decision.


FranChoice
Your New Reality
             
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
Hear industry expert Jeff Elgin speak about the rewards of franchise ownership.

Overwhelmed?
Let the industry expert consultants from FranChoice guide you in your search for the perfect franchise opportunity.
        

BIG BOY - FDD UFOC ITEM 3 Detail

Item 3 LITIGATION

 

Except for the seven actions described below, there is no litigation that must be disclosed in this Franchise Disclosure Document.

 

Litigation Against Franchisees Commenced in the Past Fiscal Year

 

Litigation to Collect Past Due Royalty Fees and Other Amounts

 

Big Boy Franchise Management LLC v EASA. Inc.. Christopher Khourv. and Rana Khourv. Macomb County (MP Circuit Court case number 07-1025-CZ. Hon. David F. Viviano. Filed on March 7, 2007. This matter was settled by a settlement and Consent Judgment entered on November 13,2007 against Defendants.

 

Big Boy Franchise Management LLC v EASA. Inc.. Christopher Khourv. and Rana Khourv: Arbitration action filed with the National Arbitration Forum, case number FA070200019373. Filed on February 13, 2007. The parties are in the process of selecting an arbitrator.

 

Big Boy Franchise Management v Khulood Karachv. Macomb County (MP Circuit Court case number 07-0010-CK. Hon. David F. Viviano. Filed on January 2, 2007. This matter remains pending.

 

Litigation Alleging Franchisee''s Breach and Abandonment of Franchise Agreement

 

Big Boy Franchise Management LLC v TCCC. Inc.. Shahpar Taleghani. Jamshid Taleghani. Cynthia Taleghani. and Hildegard Taleghani. jointly and severally. National Arbitration Forum. Claim filed December 7, 2007, alleging that Defendants breached their obligations under two franchise agreements by abandoning restaurant operations at two locations prior to the end of the term of the franchise agreements resulting in loss of franchise fees and other damages. A case number has not yet been assigned and the demand is in the process of being served upon the Defendants.

 

Big Boy Franchise Management LLC and Big Boy Food Group LLC v Manistee Big Bov. Inc. and Heide Siklich. Manistee County (MI) Circuit Court, case number 07-012885-CK. Hon. James M. Batzer. Big Boy filed a complaint on May 15, 2007, alleging that Defendants breached their obligations under a franchise agreement by abandoning restaurant operations prior to the end of the term of the franchise agreement resulting in loss of franchise fees and other damages.

 

Other Actions

 

BBB Restaurants. Inc. v Big Bov Franchise Management LLC and QSC Restaurant Corporation v Big Bov Franchise Management LLC. National Arbitration Forum. Case Numbers FA0701000882173 and FA0701000921780, respectively. On December 15, 2006, our franchisees, BBB Restaurants, Inc. and QSC Restaurant Corporation, filed arbitration claims after Big Boy terminated the Area Development Agreements and Management Agreements with each of them for non-compliance with the Development Schedule set forth in the Area Development Agreements. The cases involved related parties and similar claims and were consolidated pursuant to an order of the Arbitrator. In the cases, Claimants alleged Big Boy violated the California Business and Professions Code Section 20020 and 20021 (California Franchise Relations Act); Breach of Contract and Breach of Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing with respect to Encroachment of Area Development Agreements and Management Agreements and Wrongful Termination of Area Development Agreements and Management Agreements. Claimants requested damages, costs and attorney fees. Big Boy filed counterclaims against BBB Restaurants, Inc. ("BBB") and QSC Restaurant Corporation ("QSC") in the arbitration proceedings. In its counterclaims, Big Boy alleged that BBB and QSC breached their obligations under the Area Development Agreements by which BBB and QSC each were to develop a number of franchised Big Boy Restaurants within a specified territory in Southern California by failing to timely open their first such restaurants in the territory. Big Boy alleged that the delay in opening the franchised restaurants and therefore the failure to abide by the development schedule set forth in the Area Development Agreements caused Big Boy to incur damages in the form of (i) loss of royalty fees from the first franchised location from the period July 27, 2006 (the date by which the franchised location was to be opened) forward, (ii) loss of Big Boy commissary sales from July 27, 2006 forward, and (hi) damage to Big Boy''s goodwill and reputation. Big Boy alleged monetary damages in excess of $250,000. Big Boy has alleged that BBB''s and QSC''s breaches of their obligations under the development schedules in the Area Development Agreements gave Big Boy the right to terminate the Area Development Agreements, and that Big Boy did in fact validly exercise such right of termination such that Big Boy was free to contract with other area developer with respect to the same territory. Each of these cases was settled by the parties pursuant to one written Settlement Agreement dated October 18,2007. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Big Boy agreed to refund to BBB and QSC an aggregate amount equal to $210,000.00 and to waive the payment of certain contested past due amounts and the parties agreed that the Area Development Agreements and Management Agreements are in fact terminated and of no further force or effect.

 

 





Franchise Categories - Franchises - Big Boy Restaurant and Bakery - BIG BOY FDD & UFOC Data - BIG BOY FDD & UFOC ITEM 3 -



free tracking